Overby v. Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia

47 A.3d 1174, 616 Pa. 355, 2012 WL 2601906, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1463
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 5, 2012
DocketNo. 72 EM 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.3d 1174 (Overby v. Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overby v. Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia, 47 A.3d 1174, 616 Pa. 355, 2012 WL 2601906, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1463 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of July, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief, and the Petition for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.3d 1174, 616 Pa. 355, 2012 WL 2601906, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overby-v-common-pleas-court-of-philadelphia-pa-2012.