Overbagh v. . Patrie

New York Court of Appeals

Overbagh v. . Patrie

6 N.Y. 510

DecidedOctober 5, 1852

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.Y. 510 (Overbagh v. . Patrie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Overbagh v. . Patrie, 6 N.Y. 510 (N.Y. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

THESE causes, (the former of which is reported in 8 Barb. p. 28 et seq,) presenting the same questions discussed in the preceding case of De Peyster v. Michael, were submitted at the close of the arguments in that case, upon the briefs of counsel; by Mr. S. Stevens for the plaintiff, and Mr. A.Taber for the defendant, in the first cause, and Mr. J.Sutherland for the plaintiff, and Mr. H. Hogeboom for the defendant in the last cause.

The judgments in both cases were affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of the court in the case of De Peyster v.Michael.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THESE causes, (the former of which is reported in 8 Barb. p. 28 et seq,) presenting the same questions discussed in the preceding case of De Peyster v. Michael, were submitted at the close of the arguments in that case, upon the briefs of counsel; by Mr. S. Stevens for the plaintiff, and Mr. A.Taber for the defendant, in the first cause, and Mr. J.Sutherland for the plaintiff, and Mr. H. Hogeboom for the defendant in the last cause.

The judgments in both cases were affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of the court in the case of De Peyster v.Michael.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.Y. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overbagh-v-patrie-ny-1852.