Ovenu v. Ovenu

199 Ill. App. 385
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMay 1, 1916
DocketGen. No. 21,618
StatusPublished

This text of 199 Ill. App. 385 (Ovenu v. Ovenu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ovenu v. Ovenu, 199 Ill. App. 385 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Forcible entry and detainer, § 1*—when questions of title cannot be adjudicated. Questions of title cannot be tried or adjudicated in a forcible detainer action. 2. Forcible entry and detainer, § 5*—what constitutes forcible entry. A surreptitious entry into a vacant tenement without right or title and without the consent or knowledge of the owner is a forcible entry which entitles the owner to invoke the statute (J. & A. If 5843) to regain possession. 3. Forcible entry and detainer, . § 20*—when possession by another is possession by owner. The owner of a building is in possession thereof where it is partly occupied by tenants and the part thereof forcibly detained was in possession of the owner’s son, who had the keys until defendant secured them from him by a false pretense. 4. Forcible entry and detainer, § 2$*—when laches not defense. The fact that the owner of property failed to commence suit to recover possession until seven months after demanding possession is not a defense where defendant’s entry was unlawful and the detention without right, notice or demand for possession not being necessary in such case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 Ill. App. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ovenu-v-ovenu-illappct-1916.