Oved v. Tauber
This text of 8 A.D.3d 149 (Oved v. Tauber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered April 23, 2003, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
[150]*150The motion was properly granted based upon the deposition testimony of defendant’s property manager that there was no snow or ice in the driveway where plaintiff fell at the time of the accident, and the absence of any evidence that defendant or its property manager had actual or constructive notice of the patch of ice that allegedly caused plaintiff’s fall (see Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972 [1994]). Concur— Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.3d 149, 780 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oved-v-tauber-nyappdiv-2004.