Oved v. Tauber

8 A.D.3d 149, 780 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8670
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 149 (Oved v. Tauber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oved v. Tauber, 8 A.D.3d 149, 780 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered April 23, 2003, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[150]*150The motion was properly granted based upon the deposition testimony of defendant’s property manager that there was no snow or ice in the driveway where plaintiff fell at the time of the accident, and the absence of any evidence that defendant or its property manager had actual or constructive notice of the patch of ice that allegedly caused plaintiff’s fall (see Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972 [1994]). Concur— Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hyna v. Reese
52 A.D.3d 1254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 149, 780 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oved-v-tauber-nyappdiv-2004.