Oved v. Tauber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oved v. Tauber

8 A.D.3d 149, 780 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8670

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered April 23, 2003, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[150] The motion was properly granted based upon the deposition testimony of defendant’s property manager that there was no snow or ice in the driveway where plaintiff fell at the time of the accident, and the absence of any evidence that defendant or its property manager had actual or constructive notice of the patch of ice that allegedly caused plaintiff’s fall (see Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972 [1994]). Concur— Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered April 23, 2003, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[150] The motion was properly granted based upon the deposition testimony of defendant’s property manager that there was no snow or ice in the driveway where plaintiff fell at the time of the accident, and the absence of any evidence that defendant or its property manager had actual or constructive notice of the patch of ice that allegedly caused plaintiff’s fall (see Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972 [1994]). Concur— Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.

Oved v. Tauber, 8 A.D.3d 149, 780 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

8 A.D.3d 149 (Oved v. Tauber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related