Outler v. Berman

234 So. 2d 724, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6556
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 1970
DocketNo. 69-822
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 234 So. 2d 724 (Outler v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Outler v. Berman, 234 So. 2d 724, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a trial court order that set aside and vacated a final judgment which had been rendered on the basis of a prior default judgment.

The trial court, after hearing, determined that there was ineffective service of process on the defendant Hyman Berman. Based on its finding of ineffective service of process, the trial court found that it lacked jurisdiction over the person of the defendant Berman and ruled that the final judgment which it had previously rendered was void ab initio. Plaintiffs appeal from that order.

An examination of the record on appeal reflects that service of process was attempted on the defendant Hyman Berman pursuant to § 47.13, Fla.Stat., now § 48.031, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

There was substantial, competent evidence upon which the trial judge could find that the usual place of abode of the defendant was in Van Nuys, California at the time that substituted service of process was attempted upon him in this action. See State ex rel. Merritt v. Heffernan, 142 Fla. 496, 195 So. 145 (1940).

Generally, a judgment that is void because of a lack of jurisdiction over a defendant may be set aside or vacated at any time. Gay v. McCaughan, Fla.1958, 105 So.2d 771; Sawyer v. State, 94 Fla. 60, 113 So. 736 (1927); and Rule 1.540(b) (4), “RCP”, 31 F.S.A. See also McIntosh v. Wibbeler, Fla.1958, 106 So.2d 195. We find that there was sufficient, competent evidence in the record and reasonable inferences therefrom which support the [725]*725chancellor’s findings. See Goldstein v. Pettinger, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 740.

The order herein appealed is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnett v. Barnett
787 So. 2d 946 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Del Conte Enterprises, Inc. v. Thomas Pub. Co.
711 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Clement v. Chemical Bank
417 So. 2d 311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Balding v. Fleisher
279 So. 2d 883 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Upshaw v. Dade County
247 So. 2d 337 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Outler v. Berman
238 So. 2d 430 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 So. 2d 724, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/outler-v-berman-fladistctapp-1970.