Outing v. Weeks

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Outing v. Weeks

DecidedMarch 18, 2015

Docket2015-UP-155

StatusUnpublished

This text of Outing v. Weeks (Outing v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Outing v. Weeks, (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Ashley Outing, Appellant,

v.

Velmetria Chante Weeks, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001300

Appeal From Marion County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-155 Submitted January 1, 2015 – Filed March 18, 2015

AFFIRMED

Everett H. Garner, of Holler, Garner, Corbett, Ormond, Plante & Dunn, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. David Banner, of Aiken Bridges Elliott Tyler & Saleeby, P.A., of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: A & I, Inc. v. Gore, 366 S.C. 233, 239, 621 S.E.2d 383, 386 (Ct. App. 2005) ("Where the circuit court has affirmed the magistrate court decision, this court looks to whether the circuit court order is controlled by an error of law or is unsupported by the facts." (internal quotation marks omitted)); Price v. Pickens Cnty., 308 S.C. 64, 67, 416 S.E.2d 666, 668 (Ct. App. 1992) ("The burden is on the appellant to provide a sufficient record such that this court can make an intelligent review."); Windham v. Honeycutt, 290 S.C. 60, 64, 348 S.E.2d 185, 187 (Ct. App. 1986) ("This court will not consider facts that do not appear in the transcript of record.").

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Ashley Outing, Appellant,

v.

Velmetria Chante Weeks, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001300

Appeal From Marion County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-155 Submitted January 1, 2015 – Filed March 18, 2015

AFFIRMED

Everett H. Garner, of Holler, Garner, Corbett, Ormond, Plante & Dunn, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. David Banner, of Aiken Bridges Elliott Tyler & Saleeby, P.A., of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: A & I, Inc. v. Gore, 366 S.C. 233, 239, 621 S.E.2d 383, 386 (Ct. App. 2005) ("Where the circuit court has affirmed the magistrate court decision, this court looks to whether the circuit court order is controlled by an error of law or is unsupported by the facts." (internal quotation marks omitted)); Price v. Pickens Cnty., 308 S.C. 64, 67, 416 S.E.2d 666, 668 (Ct. App. 1992) ("The burden is on the appellant to provide a sufficient record such that this court can make an intelligent review."); Windham v. Honeycutt, 290 S.C. 60, 64, 348 S.E.2d 185, 187 (Ct. App. 1986) ("This court will not consider facts that do not appear in the transcript of record.").

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Outing v. Weeks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/outing-v-weeks-scctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack