Ousley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ousley v. State

560 S.W.3d 577

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 21, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105697

StatusPublished

This text of 560 S.W.3d 577 (Ousley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ousley v. State, 560 S.W.3d 577 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Jerry Ousley ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant was convicted of forcible rape and sentenced to 25 years in prison, which this Court affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Ousley, 481 S.W.3d 893 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *578would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Jerry Ousley ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant was convicted of forcible rape and sentenced to 25 years in prison, which this Court affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Ousley, 481 S.W.3d 893 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *578would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 S.W.3d 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ousley-v-state-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack