Ousley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ousley v. State

560 S.W.3d 577

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 21, 2018·No. No. ED 105697·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Jerry Ousley ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant was convicted of forcible rape and sentenced to 25 years in prison, which this Court affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Ousley, 481 S.W.3d 893 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *578would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Jerry Ousley ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant was convicted of forcible rape and sentenced to 25 years in prison, which this Court affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Ousley, 481 S.W.3d 893 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *578would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Ousley v. State, 560 S.W.3d 577 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

560 S.W.3d 577 (Ousley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related