Ourso v. Ourso

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Ourso v. Ourso

278 So. 2d 133, 1973 La. LEXIS 6003

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 5, 1973

DocketNo. 53626

StatusPublished

This text of 278 So. 2d 133 (Ourso v. Ourso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ourso v. Ourso, 278 So. 2d 133, 1973 La. LEXIS 6003 (La. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Robert J. Ourso, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

This writ is granted for the limited purpose of staying the execution of the judgment of contempt and incarceration, which is hereby stayed for a period of ten days or until further orders of a court of competent jurisdiction. Otherwise the application for writs is not considered. Applicant must first exhaust his remedy in the Court of Appeal. Tolbert v. Thomas, 245 La. 200, 157 So.2d 737 (1963); Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625, 137 So.2d 514 (1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Robert J. Ourso, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

This writ is granted for the limited purpose of staying the execution of the judgment of contempt and incarceration, which is hereby stayed for a period of ten days or until further orders of a court of competent jurisdiction. Otherwise the application for writs is not considered. Applicant must first exhaust his remedy in the Court of Appeal. Tolbert v. Thomas, 245 La. 200, 157 So.2d 737 (1963); Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625, 137 So.2d 514 (1961).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 So. 2d 133, 1973 La. LEXIS 6003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ourso-v-ourso-la-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack