Our Garage & Wrecker Service v. City of Columbus

424 F. App'x 536
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 2011
DocketNo. 00-3409
StatusPublished

This text of 424 F. App'x 536 (Our Garage & Wrecker Service v. City of Columbus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Our Garage & Wrecker Service v. City of Columbus, 424 F. App'x 536 (6th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellees Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, Inc., and the Towing and Recovery Association of Ohio brought suit against the City of Columbus and certain city officials to enjoin enforcement of Chapter 549 of the Columbus City Code (the “towing ordinance”), which regulates consensual towing operations. The district court held that the Interestate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c)(1), preempts the towing ordinance, and this court affirmed. Our Garage & Wrecker Serv. v. City of Columbus, 257 F.3d 506 (6th Cir.2001). The Supreme Court subsequently reversed the decision of this court and remanded the case for consideration of whether the towing ordinance qualifies as an exercise of “ ‘safety regulatory authority’ or otherwise fall[s] within § 14501(e)(2)(A)’s compass.” City of Columbus v. Ours Garage & Wrecker Serv., Inc., 536 U.S. 424, 442, 122 S.Ct. 2226, 153 L.Ed.2d 430 (2002). We now remand to the District Court for [537]*537proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 F. App'x 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/our-garage-wrecker-service-v-city-of-columbus-ca6-2011.