Oughtred v. Whetcomb

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 873
CourtNew York County Court, Suffolk County
DecidedJanuary 29, 1678
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 873 (Oughtred v. Whetcomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Suffolk County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oughtred v. Whetcomb, 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 873 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1678).

Opinion

Charles Oughtred Attourny of Samll Sheafe of London plaint. agt James Whetcomb Defdt The plaint. nonsuted in failure of process, produceing a bond wherein three persons were bound, and but one Specified in the process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Rec. Co. Ct. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oughtred-v-whetcomb-nysuffolkctyct-1678.