Ouane Thongsavath v. State
This text of Ouane Thongsavath v. State (Ouane Thongsavath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-06-0169-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
JUNE 21, 2006
______________________________
OUANE THONGSAVATH, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________
FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 27,884-C; HONORABLE PATRICK PIRTLE, JUDGE _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
ORDER ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Appellant, Ouane Thongsavath appeals from a judgment convicting him of
aggravated sexual assault. On June 9, 2006, pro se appellant filed a Motion to Proceed
in Forma Pauperis; and, Request for Free Transcription and Inclusion of Clerk’s and
Reporter’s Record on Appeal. Nothing of record appears showing the appellant is indigent
and entitled to a free record. Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District
Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court
shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing
to determine the following:
1. Whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; 2. Whether appellant is indigent; 3. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency; 4. Whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel; and, 5. What orders, if any should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued.
The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings
of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed
a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all
orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed
a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the
aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental
record with the clerk of this court on or before July 21, 2006. Should further time be
needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before July
21, 2006.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam.
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ouane Thongsavath v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ouane-thongsavath-v-state-texapp-2006.