Ouane Thongsavath v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 21, 2006
Docket07-06-00169-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ouane Thongsavath v. State (Ouane Thongsavath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ouane Thongsavath v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

NO. 07-06-0169-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JUNE 21, 2006

______________________________

OUANE THONGSAVATH, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 27,884-C; HONORABLE PATRICK PIRTLE, JUDGE _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ORDER ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant, Ouane Thongsavath appeals from a judgment convicting him of

aggravated sexual assault. On June 9, 2006, pro se appellant filed a Motion to Proceed

in Forma Pauperis; and, Request for Free Transcription and Inclusion of Clerk’s and

Reporter’s Record on Appeal. Nothing of record appears showing the appellant is indigent

and entitled to a free record. Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District

Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing

to determine the following:

1. Whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; 2. Whether appellant is indigent; 3. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency; 4. Whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel; and, 5. What orders, if any should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings

of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed

a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all

orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed

a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental

record with the clerk of this court on or before July 21, 2006. Should further time be

needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before July

21, 2006.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam.

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ouane Thongsavath v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ouane-thongsavath-v-state-texapp-2006.