Ouachita Nat. Bank v. Shell Beach Const. Co.

98 So. 160, 154 La. 709, 1920 La. LEXIS 1735
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 3, 1920
DocketNo. 24201
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 98 So. 160 (Ouachita Nat. Bank v. Shell Beach Const. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ouachita Nat. Bank v. Shell Beach Const. Co., 98 So. 160, 154 La. 709, 1920 La. LEXIS 1735 (La. 1920).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

SOMMERVILLE, J.

The plaintiff and appellee moves to dismiss the devolutive appeal taken by defendant in this cause, which is an executory proceeding, on the ground that the defendant is without interest.

The plaintiff set forth that it proceeded against the defendant and the property formerly owned by it under executory process, as it had a right to do, although defendant had long since parted with title and possession of the property, and that, after executory process had issued, the defendant sued out an injunction to prevent further proceedings, which injunction was dissolved at defendant’s cost; that no appeal was taken from that judgment, and the property has been sold in the proceeding.

The defendant evidently had sufficient interest in the suit for plaintiff to have made it a defendant in the cause, and the court cannot say at this time that it is not interested in appealing from the order directing that its property be sold.

The Constitution gives to all persons against whom judgments are rendered the right of appeal; and this court cannot take it from them.

Defendant is not alleged to have acquiesced in the judgment appealed from.

The motion to' dismiss the appeal is denied.

. PROVOSTY and O’NIELL, JJ., dissent, and O’NIELL, J., will hand down reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fayard v. Celestan
227 So. 2d 795 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
Hibernia National Bank in New Orleans v. Mary
174 So. 2d 200 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Kroger
136 So. 2d 402 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1961)
Haydel v. Frellsen
79 So. 2d 399 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1955)
Smith v. Landis
106 F. Supp. 264 (W.D. Louisiana, 1952)
Ripp v. Perrault
39 So. 2d 362 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)
Walters v. Childers
38 So. 2d 160 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1948)
Pettingill v. Hills, Inc.
6 So. 2d 660 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)
Blappert v. Pagluighi
192 So. 135 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1939)
Security Banking Co. v. Maddox
178 So. 653 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1938)
Tilly v. Woodham
166 So. 876 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Succession of Levins
167 So. 454 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1936)
Miller v. People's Homestead & Savings Ass'n
161 So. 656 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1935)
Jones v. Briscoe
154 So. 7 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1934)
State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Cage
151 So. 261 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)
Turner v. French
131 So. 289 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)
Hicks v. Lowery
128 So. 540 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Trimble v. Chavis
123 So. 513 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)
M. L. McCoy & Sons v. Scott
120 So. 770 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1929)
Bank of La Fourche v. Barrios
118 So. 893 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 160, 154 La. 709, 1920 La. LEXIS 1735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ouachita-nat-bank-v-shell-beach-const-co-la-1920.