Ouachita Flour & Seed Co. v. B. A. Olive & Son

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Ouachita Flour & Seed Co. v. B. A. Olive & Son

135 So. 774, 17 La. App. 432, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 222

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 14, 1931

DocketNo. 4054

StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 774 (Ouachita Flour & Seed Co. v. B. A. Olive & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ouachita Flour & Seed Co. v. B. A. Olive & Son, 135 So. 774, 17 La. App. 432, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 222 (La. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

DREW, J.

This matter comes before- the court on an application on behalf of B. A. Olive to remand the case for a new trial. Attached to the application is a certificate from the clerk of court of the parish of Morehouse, certifying to the fact that the record has never been lodged in this court and setting forth his reasons for not returning same here. However good his reasons may be for not completing the record, they are not good for his not returning the record as is into this court.

There is nothing before this court to remand. The record or no part of it has ever been returned here, therefore, the motion to remand the case for a new trial will have to be denied.

Causey et al. v. Central Construction Co., 2 La. App. 637.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DREW, J.

This matter comes before- the court on an application on behalf of B. A. Olive to remand the case for a new trial. Attached to the application is a certificate from the clerk of court of the parish of Morehouse, certifying to the fact that the record has never been lodged in this court and setting forth his reasons for not returning same here. However good his reasons may be for not completing the record, they are not good for his not returning the record as is into this court.

There is nothing before this court to remand. The record or no part of it has ever been returned here, therefore, the motion to remand the case for a new trial will have to be denied.

Causey et al. v. Central Construction Co., 2 La. App. 637.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 So. 774, 17 La. App. 432, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ouachita-flour-seed-co-v-b-a-olive-son-lactapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack