Otubanjo v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 4, 2008·No. 08-1099·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1099

BABATUNDE BIODUN OTUBANJO,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: August 26, 2008 Decided: September 4, 2008

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Francis Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jason Xavier Hamilton, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Babatunde Biodun Otubanjo, a native and citizen of

Nigeria, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals adopting and affirming the decision of the Immigration

Judge denying his request for a continuance for adjudication of a

petition for alien relative. We have carefully reviewed the record

and conclude that the decision to deny a continuance was not an

abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2008); Onyeme v. INS,

146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir. 1998). We accordingly deny the

petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otubanjo v. Mukasey, (4th Cir. 2008).

Otubanjo v. Mukasey (Otubanjo v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related