Ottolina v. Miller Lakes Associates

717 So. 2d 550, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1366, 1998 WL 65310
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 1998·No. No. 97-1417·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rhona Ottolina [shareholder] appeals the denial of her motion to inspect corporate records under section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (1993). We reverse the order denying the motion because the records previously provided to the shareholder are insufficient to allow her to ascertain the value of her stock and to determine whether the corporation has been properly administered. The need for the requested additional records is shown by the affidavit of the shareholder’s accountant, and, therefore, those records must be produced. See Computer Solutions, Inc. v. Gnaizda, 633 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); URT Indus. v. Scorpio Music, Inc., 567 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 581 So.2d 1311 (Fla.1991). The trial court erred in determining otherwise.

Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ottolina v. Miller Lakes Associates, 717 So. 2d 550, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1366, 1998 WL 65310 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

717 So. 2d 550 (Ottolina v. Miller Lakes Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muina v. Canning
717 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)