Otto v. Wegner
This text of 11 Misc. 2d 499 (Otto v. Wegner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the present statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193-a) impleader is permitted when the third party is liable to defendant “ for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim against him ”.
Impleader in this instance, for affirmative relief against the third-party defendant for damages independently claimed to have been sustained by the third-party plaintiff and which claim has no bearing upon the claim of the main plaintiff, should not have been allowed and the application to dismiss the second cause of action in the third-party complaint should have been granted. (See Victory Painters & Decorators v. Miller, 198 Misc. 196.)
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.
Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Misc. 2d 499, 172 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otto-v-wegner-nyappterm-1958.