Otto v. Wegner

11 Misc. 2d 499, 172 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3802
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 27, 1958·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the present statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193-a) impleader is permitted when the third party is liable to defendant for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim against him ”.

Impleader in this instance, for affirmative relief against the third-party defendant for damages independently claimed to have been sustained by the third-party plaintiff and which claim has no bearing upon the claim of the main plaintiff, should not have been allowed and the application to dismiss the second cause of action in the third-party complaint should have been granted. (See Victory Painters & Decorators v. Miller, 198 Misc. 196.)

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otto v. Wegner, 11 Misc. 2d 499, 172 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

11 Misc. 2d 499 (Otto v. Wegner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Bowker
109 Misc. 2d 39 (New York County Courts, 1981)
Briguglio & Gaddy, Inc. v. Stevenson
27 Misc. 2d 935 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)