Otto v. Pennsylvania State Education Ass'n-NEA

328 F.3d 715, 2003 WL 21027246
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 8, 2003·No. Nos. 01-3858, 01-4110; D.C. Civil Action No. 96-cv-01233·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellants having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, and to all the other available circuit judges of the Circuit in regular active service, and a majority of the circuit judges of the Circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the Court en bane, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. Chief Judge Becker * and Judge Nygaard would have granted rehearing en banc.

The judges who participated in the decision of the Court having voted for rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is granted and the opinion and judgment en[716]*716tered April 3, 2003 are vacated. An amended opinion is issued as of this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otto v. Pennsylvania State Education Ass'n-NEA, 328 F.3d 715, 2003 WL 21027246 (3d Cir. 2003).

328 F.3d 715 (Otto v. Pennsylvania State Education Ass'n-NEA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related