Otto v. Hillsborough County
181 L. Ed. 2d 731, 132 S. Ct. 1074, 565 U.S. 1109, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 404, 80 U.S.L.W. 3395, 2012 WL 33281
This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 731 (Otto v. Hillsborough County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Otto v. Hillsborough County, 181 L. Ed. 2d 731, 132 S. Ct. 1074, 565 U.S. 1109, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 404, 80 U.S.L.W. 3395, 2012 WL 33281 (U.S. 2012).
Opinion
Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until January 30, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Same case below, 70 So. 3d 587.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 731, 132 S. Ct. 1074, 565 U.S. 1109, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 404, 80 U.S.L.W. 3395, 2012 WL 33281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otto-v-hillsborough-county-scotus-2012.