Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Otto v. Araiza

Otto v. Araiza

114 P.3d 544, 200 Or. App. 561, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 805
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 6, 2005·No. C013227DRA; A124965·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Supplemental judgment for attorney fees and costs vacated and remanded. ORCP 68 C(4)(c)(i); Hurd v. Holder, 198 Or App 282, 108 P3d 87 (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otto v. Araiza, 114 P.3d 544, 200 Or. App. 561, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 805 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

114 P.3d 544 (Otto v. Araiza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hurd v. Holder
108 P.3d 87 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)