Otto v. Araiza

114 P.3d 544, 200 Or. App. 561, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 805
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 6, 2005
DocketC013227DRA; A124965
StatusPublished

This text of 114 P.3d 544 (Otto v. Araiza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Otto v. Araiza, 114 P.3d 544, 200 Or. App. 561, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 805 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Supplemental judgment for attorney fees and costs vacated and remanded. ORCP 68 C(4)(c)(i); Hurd v. Holder, 198 Or App 282, 108 P3d 87 (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hurd v. Holder
108 P.3d 87 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 P.3d 544, 200 Or. App. 561, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otto-v-araiza-orctapp-2005.