Otto Straehler v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

246 F.2d 675, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 394, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3611
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 1957
Docket13605
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 246 F.2d 675 (Otto Straehler v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Otto Straehler v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, 246 F.2d 675, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 394, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3611 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

is an action under § 34(e) of the ? with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 34(e), to review the Attorney General’s partial disallowance of a debt claim asserted against property vested under the Act. The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 F.2d 675, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 394, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otto-straehler-v-herbert-brownell-jr-attorney-general-of-the-united-cadc-1957.