Home/D.C. Circuit/Otto Straehler v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

Otto Straehler v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

246 F.2d 675, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 394, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3611
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 13, 1957·No. 13605·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

is an action under § 34(e) of the ? with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 34(e), to review the Attorney General’s partial disallowance of a debt claim asserted against property vested under the Act. The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otto Straehler v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, 246 F.2d 675, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 394, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3611 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

246 F.2d 675 (Otto Straehler v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Masami Sasaki v. Rogers
185 F. Supp. 191 (District of Columbia, 1960)
Max Reissner v. William P. Rogers, as Attorney General of the United States and Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, and Ivy Baker Priest, Treasurer of the United States, William P. Rogers, as Attorney General of the United States and Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, and Ivy Baker Priest, Treasurer of the United States v. Max Reissner
276 F.2d 506 (D.C. Circuit, 1960)
Reissner v. Rogers
276 F.2d 506 (D.C. Circuit, 1960)