Otto Rusche v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

244 F.2d 782, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 334, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 1957
Docket13361
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 244 F.2d 782 (Otto Rusche v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Otto Rusche v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, 244 F.2d 782, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 334, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in a suit brought under § 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), for the recovery of property vested by the Attorney General in 1950 and 1951 on his finding that it was enemy owned. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. Robert Bonnar v. The United States
438 F.2d 540 (Court of Claims, 1971)
Von Clemm v. Smith
255 F. Supp. 353 (S.D. New York, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 F.2d 782, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 334, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otto-rusche-v-herbert-brownell-jr-attorney-general-of-the-united-states-cadc-1957.