Otto Rusche v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
244 F.2d 782, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 334, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in a suit brought under § 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), for the recovery of property vested by the Attorney General in 1950 and 1951 on his finding that it was enemy owned. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Otto Rusche v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, 244 F.2d 782, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 334, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160 (D.C. Cir. 1957).
244 F.2d 782 (Otto Rusche v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. Robert Bonnar v. The United States
438 F.2d 540 (Court of Claims, 1971)
Von Clemm v. Smith
255 F. Supp. 353 (S.D. New York, 1965)