Otto Rusche v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
This text of 244 F.2d 782 (Otto Rusche v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in a suit brought under § 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), for the recovery of property vested by the Attorney General in 1950 and 1951 on his finding that it was enemy owned. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 F.2d 782, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 334, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otto-rusche-v-herbert-brownell-jr-attorney-general-of-the-united-states-cadc-1957.