Otto J. Vitale Real Estate, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Otto J. Vitale Real Estate, Inc. v. State

102 A.D.2d 892, 477 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19122

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 1984·Published

Opinion

— Three proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review determinations of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, all dated September 17, 1982, which, after a hearing, held that petitioners had demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency as licensed real estate brokers and imposed penalties. H Determinations confirmed and proceedings dismissed on the merits, with one bill of costs. H The record contains substantial credible evidence upon which the Secretary of State of the State of New York could reasonably conclude that all petitioners demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency as licensed real estate brokers within the provisions of section 441-c of the Real Property Law. Consequently, the determinations must be confirmed (see Matter of Grant Realty u Cuomo, 58 AD2d 251,252). We have reviewed petitioners’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Three proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review determinations of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, all dated September 17, 1982, which, after a hearing, held that petitioners had demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency as licensed real estate brokers and imposed penalties. H Determinations confirmed and proceedings dismissed on the merits, with one bill of costs. H The record contains substantial credible evidence upon which the Secretary of State of the State of New York could reasonably conclude that all petitioners demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency as licensed real estate brokers within the provisions of section 441-c of the Real Property Law. Consequently, the determinations must be confirmed (see Matter of Grant Realty u Cuomo, 58 AD2d 251,252). We have reviewed petitioners’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Otto J. Vitale Real Estate, Inc. v. State, 102 A.D.2d 892, 477 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

102 A.D.2d 892 (Otto J. Vitale Real Estate, Inc. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related