Otto Gerdau Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 322, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Otto Gerdau Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Cust. Ct. 24
United States Customs Court·Decided May 23, 1949·No. No. 53179; protests 124657-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspectors as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspectors as “manifested, not found,” is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otto Gerdau Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 322, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1641 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 322 (Otto Gerdau Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.