Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 650, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1742

DecidedSeptember 25, 1968

DocketNo. P68/406; protests 58/17281, etc. (New York); No. P68/407; protests 59/23056, etc. (New York); No. P68/408; protest 60/268 (New York); No. P68/409; protests 60/3962, etc. (New York); No. P68/410; protest 61/5002 (Seattle); No. P68/411; protests 62/5339, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P68/412; protest 67/48677 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 650 (Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 650, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1742 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Cust. Ct. 650, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otto-c-ling-son-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1968.