Ottis Mayo Jones v. Gertrude Bales
Opinion
480 F.2d 805
Ottis Mayo JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gertrude BALES et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 72-3333. Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 21, 1973.
Ottis Mayo Jones, pro se.
Gertrude Bales, pro se.
Louis C. Woolf, Knoxville, Tenn., and John E. Dougherty, Atlanta, Ga., for Cheatham and Waggoner.
John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for Kirksey and Taylor.
Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the reasons stated and authorities cited in the final order, Jones v. Bales, N.D.Ga.1972, 58 F.R.D. 453.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
480 F.2d 805 (Ottis Mayo Jones v. Gertrude Bales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.