Ottis Mayo Jones v. Gertrude Bales
This text of 480 F.2d 805 (Ottis Mayo Jones v. Gertrude Bales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
480 F.2d 805
Ottis Mayo JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gertrude BALES et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 72-3333. Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 21, 1973.
Ottis Mayo Jones, pro se.
Gertrude Bales, pro se.
Louis C. Woolf, Knoxville, Tenn., and John E. Dougherty, Atlanta, Ga., for Cheatham and Waggoner.
John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for Kirksey and Taylor.
Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the reasons stated and authorities cited in the final order, Jones v. Bales, N.D.Ga.1972, 58 F.R.D. 453.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
480 F.2d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ottis-mayo-jones-v-gertrude-bales-ca5-1973.