Ottinger v. Seligson

405 F.2d 493
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 17, 1968·No. Docket 32638-44·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The motions of the Trustee and the Liquidator to dismiss the appeal are granted. Judge Tyler’s order remanding to the Referee for further hearings the question of the sufficiency of the Liquidator’s accounting is an interlocutory order concerning “[a controversy] arising in proceedings in bankruptcy,” which is not appealable under 11 U.S.C. § 47(a). Moreover, the appellants are not aggrieved by the denial of their request for an order requiring the New York Stock Exchange and the creditor Banks to submit an accounting, since the denial was without prejudice to their making a formal application for such relief in the future.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ottinger v. Seligson, 405 F.2d 493 (2d Cir. 1968).

405 F.2d 493 (Ottinger v. Seligson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ira Haupt & Co. v. Seligson
405 F.2d 493 (Second Circuit, 1968)