Ottimo v. Weatherly Securities Corp.

306 A.D.2d 287, 760 N.Y.S.2d 364
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 2, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 287 (Ottimo v. Weatherly Securities Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ottimo v. Weatherly Securities Corp., 306 A.D.2d 287, 760 N.Y.S.2d 364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7502 (c) for injunctive relief in connection with an arbitrable controversy, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), dated September 18, 2002, which denied their motion, inter alia, to enjoin the respondent from assigning, disposing of, transferring, or removing from its current accounts money, properties, and/or other assets to the extent of $1,000,000, and (2) granted the respondent’s cross motion to vacate an ex parte temporary restraining order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A court may grant a preliminary injunction in connection with an arbitrable controversy “only upon the ground that the award to which the applicant may be entitled may be rendered ineffectual without such provisional relief’ (CPLR 7502 [c]; see Matter of Kal Data v AMC Computer Corp., 268 AD2d 589 [2000]). In addition, to obtain relief under that section, a petitioner must make a showing of the traditional equitable criteria for the granting of temporary relief under CPLR article 63 (see Itzkowitz v G & I Passover Bakery Corp., 303 AD2d 638 [2003]; Matter of Kal Data v AMC Computer Corp., supra; Matter of Cullman Ventures, 252 AD2d 222, 230 [1998]; SG Cowen Secs. Corp. v Messih, 224 F3d 79, 82-84 [2000]). In the instant case, the petitioners failed to establish their entitlement to injunctive relief pursuant to CPLR 6301.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the petition[288]*288ers’ remaining contention. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Astoria Equities 2000 LLC v. Halletts A Development Co., LLC
47 Misc. 3d 171 (New York Supreme Court, 2014)
Advanced Digital Security Solutions, Inc. v. Samsung Techwin Co.
53 A.D.3d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
K.W.F. Realty Corp. v. Kaufman
16 A.D.3d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Matter of Cheng v. Worldco, L.L.C.
2003 NY Slip Op 51488(U) (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Spatz v. Ridge Lea Associates, LLC
309 A.D.2d 1248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 A.D.2d 287, 760 N.Y.S.2d 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ottimo-v-weatherly-securities-corp-nyappdiv-2003.