Ottilie Ruth Sara Katz, Also Known as Mrs. Nathan Katz, and Cross-Appellee v. Cie Generale Transatlantique, a Corporation, Owner, and Cross-Appellant

Fourth Circuit

Ottilie Ruth Sara Katz, Also Known as Mrs. Nathan Katz, and Cross-Appellee v. Cie Generale Transatlantique, a Corporation, Owner, and Cross-Appellant

271 F.2d 590, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3222, 1960 A.M.C. 52

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 26, 1959

Docket7918_1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 271 F.2d 590 (Ottilie Ruth Sara Katz, Also Known as Mrs. Nathan Katz, and Cross-Appellee v. Cie Generale Transatlantique, a Corporation, Owner, and Cross-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ottilie Ruth Sara Katz, Also Known as Mrs. Nathan Katz, and Cross-Appellee v. Cie Generale Transatlantique, a Corporation, Owner, and Cross-Appellant, 271 F.2d 590, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3222, 1960 A.M.C. 52 (4th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While a passenger on the steamship Liberte on July 4, 1956, Ottilie Ruth Sara Katz, the appellant, injured her foot in striking it against a door sill said to have been negligently constructed and inadequately lighted. Some months later, on January 8, 1957, she fell in Richmond, Virginia, and fractured her wrist, as a result of which she suffered a disability which she claims has destroyed or impaired her earning power as a beautician. She attributes the second fall and injury to unsteadiness caused by the first injury, and seeks to hold the ship liable for both.

Her action was brought in admiralty, and the Judge, who sat without a jury, accepted her version of the accident aboard ship and awarded her $3000.00 damages for the foot injury. He held, however, that she had failed to carry the burden resting upon her to prove that the second injury, in Richmond, was caused by the earlier injury to the foot while on the Liberte, and he refused to award damages against the ship for the *591 second fall, which resulted in injury to her wrist. Mrs. Katz appealed and the ship cross-appealed.

In this court, counsel for the respective parties have argued earnestly and at length, but we perceive in the case nothing more than questions of fact as to which it was the Judge’s function to resolve the conflicting testimony. We cannot say that the Judge’s findings are clearly erroneous.

The judgment will be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

While a passenger on the steamship Liberte on July 4, 1956, Ottilie Ruth Sara Katz, the appellant, injured her foot in striking it against a door sill said to have been negligently constructed and inadequately lighted. Some months later, on January 8, 1957, she fell in Richmond, Virginia, and fractured her wrist, as a result of which she suffered a disability which she claims has destroyed or impaired her earning power as a beautician. She attributes the second fall and injury to unsteadiness caused by the first injury, and seeks to hold the ship liable for both.

Her action was brought in admiralty, and the Judge, who sat without a jury, accepted her version of the accident aboard ship and awarded her $3000.00 damages for the foot injury. He held, however, that she had failed to carry the burden resting upon her to prove that the second injury, in Richmond, was caused by the earlier injury to the foot while on the Liberte, and he refused to award damages against the ship for the *591 second fall, which resulted in injury to her wrist. Mrs. Katz appealed and the ship cross-appealed.

In this court, counsel for the respective parties have argued earnestly and at length, but we perceive in the case nothing more than questions of fact as to which it was the Judge’s function to resolve the conflicting testimony. We cannot say that the Judge’s findings are clearly erroneous.

The judgment will be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 F.2d 590, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3222, 1960 A.M.C. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ottilie-ruth-sara-katz-also-known-as-mrs-nathan-katz-and-cross-appellee-ca4-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack