Otteson v. Baird

392 P.2d 1017, 15 Utah 2d 332, 1964 Utah LEXIS 262
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1964
DocketNo. 10018
StatusPublished

This text of 392 P.2d 1017 (Otteson v. Baird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Otteson v. Baird, 392 P.2d 1017, 15 Utah 2d 332, 1964 Utah LEXIS 262 (Utah 1964).

Opinion

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

This case involves about $550 claimed by a father and son for wages. Five prominent lawyers took part. There is no legal problem involved, but about 150 pages of record [333]*333Ire. The question is who promised whom fvhat. The trial court decided who promised [«■horn. The case strictly is factual, unfortunately for lawyers who have to buy books and read our decisions. Though this writer may have decided otherwise, the trial court held for the plaintiff on controverted evidence. Under familiar rules anent appellate procedure we affirm, with costs to respondent.

McDonough, callister, crock-ETT and WADE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 P.2d 1017, 15 Utah 2d 332, 1964 Utah LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otteson-v-baird-utah-1964.