Otteson v. Baird

Utah Supreme Court

Otteson v. Baird

392 P.2d 1017, 15 Utah 2d 332, 1964 Utah LEXIS 262

Utah Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1964·No. No. 10018·Published

Opinion

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

This case involves about $550 claimed by a father and son for wages. Five prominent lawyers took part. There is no legal problem involved, but about 150 pages of record [333]*333Ire. The question is who promised whom fvhat. The trial court decided who promised [«■horn. The case strictly is factual, unfortunately for lawyers who have to buy books and read our decisions. Though this writer may have decided otherwise, the trial court held for the plaintiff on controverted evidence. Under familiar rules anent appellate procedure we affirm, with costs to respondent.

McDonough, callister, crock-ETT and WADE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

This case involves about $550 claimed by a father and son for wages. Five prominent lawyers took part. There is no legal problem involved, but about 150 pages of record [333]*333Ire. The question is who promised whom fvhat. The trial court decided who promised [«■horn. The case strictly is factual, unfortunately for lawyers who have to buy books and read our decisions. Though this writer may have decided otherwise, the trial court held for the plaintiff on controverted evidence. Under familiar rules anent appellate procedure we affirm, with costs to respondent.

McDonough, callister, crock-ETT and WADE, JJ., concur.

Otteson v. Baird, 392 P.2d 1017, 15 Utah 2d 332, 1964 Utah LEXIS 262 (Utah 1964).

Pincite

392 P.2d 1017 (Otteson v. Baird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.