Ottesen v. State

899 So. 2d 1277, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5950, 2005 WL 954956
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ottesen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 862 So. 2d 30
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2005·No. No. 2D04-4238·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Nathaniel Ottesen appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s denial with regards to claims one, two, and four through thirteen. However, the trial court failed to address claim three, as previously ordered by this court. See Ottesen v. State, 862 So.2d 30 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Accordingly, this claim must once again be remanded to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute claim three.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

STRINGER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ottesen v. State, 899 So. 2d 1277, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5950, 2005 WL 954956 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

899 So. 2d 1277 (Ottesen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ottesen v. State
862 So. 2d 30 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)