Otteridge v. Thompson
18 F. Cas. 910, 2 D.C. 108, 2 Cranch 108
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 18 F. Cas. 910 (Otteridge v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Otteridge v. Thompson, 18 F. Cas. 910, 2 D.C. 108, 2 Cranch 108 (circtddc 1814).
Opinion
at the request of the plaintiff’s counsel, instructed the jury that, from the circumstances above stated, they might presume that the plaintiff was residing here under the permission and license of the government, although he had not reported himself according to the proclamation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Caparell v. Goodbody
29 A.2d 563 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Manaka v. Monterey Sardine Industries, Inc.
48 F. Supp. 625 (N.D. California, 1942)
Uberti v. Maiatico
44 F. Supp. 724 (District of Columbia, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 910, 2 D.C. 108, 2 Cranch 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otteridge-v-thompson-circtddc-1814.