Otter Creek Mall v. Quinn Companies, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Otter Creek Mall v. Quinn Companies, Inc.

759 S.W.2d 810, 297 Ark. 136, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 496

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedNovember 21, 1988

Docket88-114

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 759 S.W.2d 810 (Otter Creek Mall v. Quinn Companies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Otter Creek Mall v. Quinn Companies, Inc., 759 S.W.2d 810, 297 Ark. 136, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 496 (Ark. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is an appeal from a dismissal of the appellants’ interpleader action. We hold it is not a final order and dismiss the appeal under ARCP Rule 54(b).

There was an existing lawsuit between the appellee Luke Quinn and two entities called Otter Creek Park and Otter Creek Park Company. The appellants, not parties to that lawsuit, owed Quinn $37,337.68 on a note.

Proceeding more like intervenors, the appellants filed a motion for interpleader in the existing lawsuit alleging the money was claimed not only by Quinn but by Otter Creek Park.

A special judge signed an ex parte order granting the motion. Upon learning of this, Quinn immediately asked that the interpleader be dismissed saying there were no competing claims to the money. The regular trial judge set aside the ex parte order and dismissed the appellants from the suit.

The interpleader was not filed as an original, independent action. The appellants injected themselves into an existing lawsuit. As a result the order dismissing them left other claims and parties remaining in the case and was not a final order. ARCP Rule 54(b).

Appeal dismissed.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI