Ottenot v. . New York Lackawanna and Western Railway Co.
23 N.E. 1143, 119 N.Y. 603
Opinion
reads for reversal and new trial.
Finch and Gbay, JJ., concur; Bugeb, Ch. J., Andbews and Peckham, JJ., concur in result on the ground that there is another remedy,? and because of the erroneous admission •of evidence as to damages.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ottenot v. . New York Lackawanna and Western Railway Co., 23 N.E. 1143, 119 N.Y. 603 (N.Y. 1890).
23 N.E. 1143 (Ottenot v. . New York Lackawanna and Western Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meruk v. . City of New York
119 N.E. 571 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Bennett v. City of Marion
93 N.W. 558 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Dennis v. Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co.
137 Ala. 649 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1902)
Fries v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.
62 N.E. 358 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Kenyon v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad
51 N.Y.S. 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Matter of Grade Crossing Commissioners
49 N.E. 127 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
In re Grade Crossing Commissioners
17 A.D. 54 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
In re Grade-crossing Com'rs
44 N.Y.S. 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Moore v. N. Y. Elevated Railroad
30 Abb. N. Cas. 306 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Compton
18 L.R.A. 390 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)