Otten v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.

229 F.2d 919
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 6, 1956·No. No. 193, Docket 23821·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Obedient to his sincere religious convictions, plaintiff refused to join the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor herein which had entered into a union shop agreement with the defendant, plaintiff’s former employer. He brought this suit to avert his then impending discharge based up[920]*920on such refusal, his theory being that the 1951 amendment to the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 152 (11th), as applied to him is an unconstitutional interference with the free exercise of religion.

On a prior appeal, we affirmed an order denying plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a three-judge court to pass on the constitutionality of the statute. Neither the trial which was subsequently had nor the briefs on the present appeal raise any questions that seem to us to require any amplification of our prior opinion, reported in 2 Cir., 205 F.2d 58.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otten v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co., 229 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1956).

229 F.2d 919 (Otten v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related