Otte v. Pierce
178 P.2d 676, 116 Colo. 77, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 284
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedFebruary 24, 1947
DocketNo. 15,773.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 178 P.2d 676 (Otte v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Otte v. Pierce, 178 P.2d 676, 116 Colo. 77, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 284 (Colo. 1947).
Opinion
On motion of defendant in an action for divorce to hold plaintiff in contempt for his failure to pay her temporary alimony as ordered by the court. Motion denied. Affirmed en banc without written opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Otte v. Pierce
194 P.2d 331 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 P.2d 676, 116 Colo. 77, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otte-v-pierce-colo-1947.