OTTAWA PROPERTIES 1 LLC v. US BANK, NA, etc.
This text of OTTAWA PROPERTIES 1 LLC v. US BANK, NA, etc. (OTTAWA PROPERTIES 1 LLC v. US BANK, NA, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 3, 2021.
________________
No. 3D20-1791 Lower Tribunal No. 13-7027 ________________
Ottawa Properties 1 LLC, Appellant,
vs.
U.S. Bank, N.A., etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz, Judge.
Wesoloski Carlson, P.A., and Erik D. Wesoloski, for appellant.
Akerman LLP, and Nancy M. Wallace (Tallahassee) and William P. Heller (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR Ottawa Properties 1 LLC, defendant titleholder in a foreclosure action,
appeals a non-final order denying its motion to quash service of process.
Ottawa had moved in the trial court to quash service of process on the basis
that U.S. Bank failed to file a return receipt, as required by section 48.161(1),
Florida Statutes, and failed to attempt service at Ottawa’s principal address
or its manager’s address, pursuant to section 48.062, Florida Statutes,
before effecting substitute service on the Secretary of State. Based upon
U.S. Bank’s commendable confession of error, and our review of the record,
we reverse the denial of the motion to quash service and remand for further
proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
OTTAWA PROPERTIES 1 LLC v. US BANK, NA, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ottawa-properties-1-llc-v-us-bank-na-etc-fladistctapp-2021.