Ottawa Northern Railroad, LLC v. Baldwin City, Kansas, City of

D. Kansas

Ottawa Northern Railroad, LLC v. Baldwin City, Kansas, City of

DecidedNovember 7, 2023

Docket2:23-cv-02363

StatusUnknown

This text of Ottawa Northern Railroad, LLC v. Baldwin City, Kansas, City of (Ottawa Northern Railroad, LLC v. Baldwin City, Kansas, City of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ottawa Northern Railroad, LLC v. Baldwin City, Kansas, City of, (D. Kan. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

OTTAWA NORTHERN RAILROAD, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION ) v. ) No. 23-2363-KHV ) CITY OF BALDWIN, KANSAS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________________)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion For Default Judgment Against Defendant J. Warren Co., Inc. (Doc. #42) filed October 11, 2023. For reasons stated below, the Court construes plaintiff’s motion only as a motion for entry of default and sustains plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff asks the Court to enter default judgment on its claims against J. Warren Company, Inc. Rule 55, Fed. R. Civ. P., however, contemplates a two-step process by which a party first receives an entry of default under Rule 55(a) and then applies for default judgment under Rule 55(b). See Garrett v. Seymour, 217 F. App’x 835, 838 (10th Cir. 2007) (entry of default under Rule 55(a) is prerequisite for entry of default judgment under Rule 55(b)). Because plaintiff cannot proceed directly to default judgment, the Court construes its motion as one for entry of default. On August 23, 2023, plaintiff effected service upon defendant. Under Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(i), Fed. R. Civ. P., defendant had 21 days, or until September 13, 2023, to file an answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s claims. Defendant has not done so. Because defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend the claims, plaintiff is entitled to an entry of default under Rule 55(a). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion For Default Judgment Against Defendant J. Warren Co., Inc. (Doc. #42) filed October 11, 2023, which the Court construes only as a motion for entry of default, is SUSTAINED. The Court directs the Clerk to enter default against defendant J. Warren Company, Inc. on the claims set forth in plaintiff’s complaint. Dated this 7th day of November, 2023 at Kansas City, Kansas.

s/ Kathryn H. Vratil KATHRYN H. VRATIL United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

OTTAWA NORTHERN RAILROAD, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION ) v. ) No. 23-2363-KHV ) CITY OF BALDWIN, KANSAS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________________)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion For Default Judgment Against Defendant J. Warren Co., Inc. (Doc. #42) filed October 11, 2023. For reasons stated below, the Court construes plaintiff’s motion only as a motion for entry of default and sustains plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff asks the Court to enter default judgment on its claims against J. Warren Company, Inc. Rule 55, Fed. R. Civ. P., however, contemplates a two-step process by which a party first receives an entry of default under Rule 55(a) and then applies for default judgment under Rule 55(b). See Garrett v. Seymour, 217 F. App’x 835, 838 (10th Cir. 2007) (entry of default under Rule 55(a) is prerequisite for entry of default judgment under Rule 55(b)). Because plaintiff cannot proceed directly to default judgment, the Court construes its motion as one for entry of default. On August 23, 2023, plaintiff effected service upon defendant. Under Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(i), Fed. R. Civ. P., defendant had 21 days, or until September 13, 2023, to file an answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s claims. Defendant has not done so. Because defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend the claims, plaintiff is entitled to an entry of default under Rule 55(a). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion For Default Judgment Against Defendant J. Warren Co., Inc. (Doc. #42) filed October 11, 2023, which the Court construes only as a motion for entry of default, is SUSTAINED. The Court directs the Clerk to enter default against defendant J. Warren Company, Inc. on the claims set forth in plaintiff’s complaint. Dated this 7th day of November, 2023 at Kansas City, Kansas.

s/ Kathryn H. Vratil KATHRYN H. VRATIL United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ottawa Northern Railroad, LLC v. Baldwin City, Kansas, City of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ottawa-northern-railroad-llc-v-baldwin-city-kansas-city-of-ksd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack