Ottavia, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ottavia, Inc. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1791

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 3, 1967

DocketNo. P67/223

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 865 (Ottavia, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ottavia, Inc. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1791 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, C.J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of brass pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc. v. United States (52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of brass holders, portier hooks, portier brackets, curtain roses, portier hooks with sliplock holders, finials, curtain holdbacks with sliplock holders, sliplock holders and extension rods, and tie-back hooks, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver or colored with gold lacquer, chiefly used as household utensils, and following the principles in C.A.D. 852, supra, and Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., and Alltransport, Inc. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of brass pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. 0. DeJong & Go., Inc. v. United States (52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of brass holders, portier hooks, portier brackets, curtain roses, portier hooks with sliplock holders, finials, curtain holdbacks with sliplock holders, sliplock holders and extension rods, and tie-back hooks, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver or colored with gold lacquer, chiefly used as household utensils, and following the principles in C.A.D. 852, supra, and Kroder Beubel Go., Ine., and ATltransport, Inc. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C.J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of brass pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc. v. United States (52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of brass holders, portier hooks, portier brackets, curtain roses, portier hooks with sliplock holders, finials, curtain holdbacks with sliplock holders, sliplock holders and extension rods, and tie-back hooks, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver or colored with gold lacquer, chiefly used as household utensils, and following the principles in C.A.D. 852, supra, and Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., and Alltransport, Inc. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of brass pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. 0. DeJong & Go., Inc. v. United States (52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of brass holders, portier hooks, portier brackets, curtain roses, portier hooks with sliplock holders, finials, curtain holdbacks with sliplock holders, sliplock holders and extension rods, and tie-back hooks, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver or colored with gold lacquer, chiefly used as household utensils, and following the principles in C.A.D. 852, supra, and Kroder Beubel Go., Ine., and ATltransport, Inc. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ottavia-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack