Ottah v. Verifone System Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 11, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-09645·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED CHIKEZIE OTTAH, DOC #; —____ DATE FILED: _7/11/2022 Plaintiff, -against- 21 Civ. 9645 (AT) (GWG) VERIFONE SYSTEM INC., ORDER Defendant. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: The Report & Recommendation (the “R&R”) of the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein, was filed on ECF on June 21, 2022, and mailed to Plaintiff pro se on June 22, 2022. ECF No. 35; June 22, 2022 Dkt. Entry. The Court received no objections by the deadline of July 6, 2022. See Horton v. City of New York, 636 Fed. Appx. 822, 823 (2d Cir. 2016) (mailing of a report and recommendation is service within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)). Therefore, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety, and DISMISSES the case. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all open motions, close the case, and mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 11, 2022 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ottah v. Verifone System Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Ottah v. Verifone System Inc. (Ottah v. Verifone System Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horton v. City of New York
636 F. App'x 822 (Second Circuit, 2016)