Ottah v. Verifone System Inc.
This text of Ottah v. Verifone System Inc. (Ottah v. Verifone System Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED CHIKEZIE OTTAH, DOC #; —____ DATE FILED: _7/11/2022 Plaintiff, -against- 21 Civ. 9645 (AT) (GWG) VERIFONE SYSTEM INC., ORDER Defendant. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: The Report & Recommendation (the “R&R”) of the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein, was filed on ECF on June 21, 2022, and mailed to Plaintiff pro se on June 22, 2022. ECF No. 35; June 22, 2022 Dkt. Entry. The Court received no objections by the deadline of July 6, 2022. See Horton v. City of New York, 636 Fed. Appx. 822, 823 (2d Cir. 2016) (mailing of a report and recommendation is service within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)). Therefore, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety, and DISMISSES the case. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all open motions, close the case, and mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 11, 2022 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ottah v. Verifone System Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ottah-v-verifone-system-inc-nysd-2022.