Ott v. Metropolitan Jockey Club

282 A.D. 1060, 126 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5817
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ott v. Metropolitan Jockey Club. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 A.D. 946

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. ■ Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following questions are certified: 1. Was the order of the Special Term, entered May 25, 1951, properly made? 2. Was the order of this court, entered November 2, 1953, properly made? Present — Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. [See ante, p. 946.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ott v. Metropolitan Jockey Club, 282 A.D. 1060, 126 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 1060 (Ott v. Metropolitan Jockey Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.