Ott v. Chapline
3 Md. 323
Opinion
in this case, determined that the plaintiff, being a collector and having taxes to collect from the defendant, but having omitted to levy them as empotvered, and having afterwards paid the amount of them over to the public, is entitled to support an action for money paid at the defendant’s request.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ott v. Chapline, 3 Md. 323 (Va. Super. Ct. 1793).
3 Md. 323 (Ott v. Chapline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.