Otsego County Coop. Ass'n v. Commissioner

11 T.C.M. 818, 1952 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 125
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJuly 31, 1952
DocketDocket No. 28479.
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 T.C.M. 818 (Otsego County Coop. Ass'n v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Otsego County Coop. Ass'n v. Commissioner, 11 T.C.M. 818, 1952 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 125 (tax 1952).

Opinion

Otsego County Cooperative Association, Inc. v. Commissioner.
Otsego County Coop. Ass'n v. Commissioner
Docket No. 28479.
United States Tax Court
1952 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 125; 11 T.C.M. (CCH) 818; T.C.M. (RIA) 52246;
July 31, 1952

*125 Petitioner is a cooperative corporation organized under the laws of Michigan. It paid patronage refunds to its patrons during the taxable years 1946, 1947, and 1948 and excluded the amount of such refunds from its gross income. Respondent denied the exclusions on the ground that petitioner was not legally obligated to make the payments and that therefore such amounts were income to it. Held, petitioner was legally obligated to make such payments and they should be excluded in computing petitioner's net income subject to tax.

Eugene L. Hensel, Esq., 8 E. Long St., Columbus, Ohio, for the petitioner. John L. King, Esq., for the respondent.

RICE

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

Petitioner requests a redetermination of its deficiencies in income tax and declared value excess profits tax as follows:

Taxable YearDeclared Value
EndedExcess
June 30Income TaxProfits Tax
1946$1,308.38$313.31
1947793.29
1948652.48
The question to be decided is whether petitioner is entitled to exclude from gross income amounts of patronage refunds distributed by petitioner to its patrons in the taxable years. Some of the facts were stipulated.

Findings of Fact

The stipulated facts are so found and are incorporated herein.

The petitioner is a cooperative corporation organized under the laws of the State of Michigan. Its original Articles of Incorporation were filed with the Secretary of State on November 17, 1936, as a cooperative corporation for profit, under Title 21.98 to 21.108 of the Michigan Statutes Annotated, which is a part of the*127 general corporation law of Michigan. By an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State on August 12, 1943, petitioner was converted from a cooperative corporation for profit to a nonprofit cooperative corporation. Four principal changes were effected by the adoption of the amendment: (1) the authorized shares of capital stock were reduced from two classes to one class; (2) payment of dividends on capital stock was prohibited; (3) the qualification for ownership of stock was limited to producers of agricultural products who patronized the corporation; and (4) a revolving certificate of indebtedness system was inaugurated. The original By-Laws of the petitioner were adopted September 15, 1936. Articles II, VII, VIII, and XIII were amended on July 28, 1943.

Under the terms of its Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws, the petitioner was organized to operate as a farmers' cooperative, and to engage in the marketing of farm products and the purchase and distribution of farm production supplies, on a cooperative basis, for the mutual benefit of its members and other producers of agricultural products. Each stockholder was entitled to only one vote, regardless*128 of the number of shares owned. Voting stock could not be sold, assigned, or conveyed by the holders thereof without the prior approval and consent of the board of directors. During the taxable years involved, only common voting stock was issued and outstanding.

The methods used by petitioner in the receipt and disposal of revenues were governed by Article VIII of the By-Laws.

Section 4 of that Article provides:

"The corporation is authorized to deduct and retain from sales proceeds of agricultural products or supplies or charges for services such amounts as are deemed necessary and adequate for expenses, including provision for depreciation and other valuation reserves, interest on indebtedness, and for all capital purposes including capital reserves and surpluses required or permitted by law, and such other amounts as shall be necessary for furth [forth] capitalization of the corporation."

Section 5 of the Article provides for the disposition of amounts retained during the year for capital purposes, as follows:

"At the close of each fiscal year amounts retained during the year for capital purposes and amounts deducted from sales proceeds or charges for services in excess*129 of amount required for expenses, including provision for depreciation and other valuation reserves and for interest on indebtedness, shall be distributed upon a patronage basis as revolving fund credits to the patrons delivering the products, purchasing supplies or receiving services from the corporation."

Section 6 of the Article, which relates to the allocation to patrons of general reserves, is as follows:

"The books and records of the corporation shall be kept in such manner, by years, that the amount retained and carried to general reserves accruing from the patronage of each patron, stockholder and non-stockholder, is allocated to each separately.

"Whenever in a given year the operation of the corporation results in a net loss, such loss, to the extent that general reserves are available, shall be charged against the same and they shall be thereby reduced accordingly. The board of directors shall prescribe the bais [basic] on which the reserve contributions of patrons by years shall be reduced on account of any such loss, so that it will be borne on as equitable basis as the board of directors finds practical.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mississippi Chemical Company
326 F.2d 569 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 T.C.M. 818, 1952 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otsego-county-coop-assn-v-commissioner-tax-1952.