O'Toole v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Toole v. Young

234 A.D. 846

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 846 (O'Toole v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Toole v. Young, 234 A.D. 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff Alfred O’Toole, and the order appealed from in so far as it denies motion for a new trial as to said plaintiff, affirmed, with costs. Judgment in favor of plaintiff Agnes O’Toole, and the order appealed from in so far as it denies motion for a new trial as to said plaintiff, reversed, and the action severed, and a new trial ordered as to said plaintiff, with costs to the appellant, John H. Young, to abide the event, unless said plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment in her favor as entered to the sum of $653.60; in which event the said judgment as so modified and the order appealed from are affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present -—■ Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff Alfred O’Toole, and the order appealed from in so far as it denies motion for a new trial as to said plaintiff, affirmed, with costs. Judgment in favor of plaintiff Agnes O’Toole, and the order appealed from in so far as it denies motion for a new trial as to said plaintiff, reversed, and the action severed, and a new trial ordered as to said plaintiff, with costs to the appellant, John H. Young, to abide the event, unless said plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment in her favor as entered to the sum of $653.60; in which event the said judgment as so modified and the order appealed from are affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present -—■ Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otoole-v-young-nyappdiv-1931.