Otis v. Butters
This text of 64 N.W. 1093 (Otis v. Butters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Each assignment in the petition in error, as well as every proposition discussed in the brief, is predicated upon matters disclosed solely by the supplemental transcript filed by the plaintiff in error in this court on July 9, 1894, and which alone contains the purported judgment sought to be reviewed. This transcript cannot be recognized by us, inasmuch as it is not authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the court below, as by statute required. Following Moore v. Waterman, 40 Neb., 498, and McDonald v. Grabow, 46 Neb., 406, decided herewith, the petition in error is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 N.W. 1093, 46 Neb. 492, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otis-v-butters-neb-1895.