Otis v. Butters

64 N.W. 1093, 46 Neb. 492, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 499
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 1895·No. No. 5763·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Norval, C. J.

Each assignment in the petition in error, as well as every proposition discussed in the brief, is predicated upon matters disclosed solely by the supplemental transcript filed by the plaintiff in error in this court on July 9, 1894, and which alone contains the purported judgment sought to be reviewed. This transcript cannot be recognized by us, inasmuch as it is not authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the court below, as by statute required. Following Moore v. Waterman, 40 Neb., 498, and McDonald v. Grabow, 46 Neb., 406, decided herewith, the petition in error is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otis v. Butters, 64 N.W. 1093, 46 Neb. 492, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 499 (Neb. 1895).

64 N.W. 1093 (Otis v. Butters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Basin State Bank
296 P. 1074 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1931)
Forbes v. Morearty
74 N.W. 822 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Bailey v. Eastman
74 N.W. 959 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
P. Brockman Commission Co. v. Sang
72 N.W. 856 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)
Smith v. Beagle
69 N.W. 936 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)
Einspahr v. Exchange National Bank
68 N.W. 933 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Union Pacific Railroad v. Kinney
66 N.W. 449 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Romberg v. Fokken
66 N.W. 282 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)