Otis Mays v. Bernard Holmes, et al.

D. Minnesota

Otis Mays v. Bernard Holmes, et al.

DecidedDecember 30, 2025

Docket0:25-cv-03113

StatusUnknown

This text of Otis Mays v. Bernard Holmes, et al. (Otis Mays v. Bernard Holmes, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Otis Mays v. Bernard Holmes, et al., (mnd 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Otis Mays, No. 25-cv-3113 (KMM/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Bernard Holmes, et al.,

Defendants. In a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated September 3, 2025, United States

Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz recommends that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff Otis Mays did not object to this recommended disposition, so the Court has reviewed the matter for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). The Court finds no error and adopts the R&R.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (Dkt. 4) is ACCEPTED. 2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly. Date: December 30, 2025 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI