Otis Elevator Co. v. Shannon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Otis Elevator Co. v. Shannon

630 So. 2d 226, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 250, 1994 WL 16617

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 1994·No. No. 93-03814·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Otis Elevator, defendant below, seeks cer-tiorari review of an order compelling discovery. The controversy involves numerous interrogatories and requests for production, which Otis complains are unduly burdensome and unlikely to result in the discovery of relevant evidence. The response by plaintiff Floyd Shannon includes concessions about the scope of his discovery request which, considered in conjunction with the record and the arguments of counsel, persuade us that the circuit court’s order does not depart from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, we deny the petition for certiorari.

[227]*227CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Otis Elevator, defendant below, seeks cer-tiorari review of an order compelling discovery. The controversy involves numerous interrogatories and requests for production, which Otis complains are unduly burdensome and unlikely to result in the discovery of relevant evidence. The response by plaintiff Floyd Shannon includes concessions about the scope of his discovery request which, considered in conjunction with the record and the arguments of counsel, persuade us that the circuit court’s order does not depart from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, we deny the petition for certiorari.

[227]*227CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur

Otis Elevator Co. v. Shannon, 630 So. 2d 226, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 250, 1994 WL 16617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

630 So. 2d 226 (Otis Elevator Co. v. Shannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.