Otis Elevator Co. v. Ross

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Otis Elevator Co. v. Ross

463 So. 2d 1219, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12362

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 1985

DocketNo. 84-889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 463 So. 2d 1219 (Otis Elevator Co. v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Otis Elevator Co. v. Ross, 463 So. 2d 1219, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12362 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Dragon v. Grant, 429 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Quinn v. Millard, 358 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Zack v. Centro Espanol Hospital, Inc., 319 So.2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); LaBarbera v. Millan Builders, Inc., 191 So.2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966); see Jaime v. Vilberg, 363 So.2d 386, 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (hospital records are admissible under the business record exception to the hearsay rule only upon the laying of a proper foundation).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Dragon v. Grant, 429 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Quinn v. Millard, 358 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Zack v. Centro Espanol Hospital, Inc., 319 So.2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); LaBarbera v. Millan Builders, Inc., 191 So.2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966); see Jaime v. Vilberg, 363 So.2d 386, 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (hospital records are admissible under the business record exception to the hearsay rule only upon the laying of a proper foundation).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 So. 2d 1219, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otis-elevator-co-v-ross-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack