Otis Elevator Co. v. Cape Fear Hotel Co.
172 N.C. 319
Opinion
The written contract furnishes evidence that the defendant was dealing with the plaintiff as a corporation, and it was therefore competent against the defendant as evidence of corporate existence. Ryan v. Martin, 91 N. C., 465; Bank v. Duffy, 156 N. C., 84.
[320] It also follows, as this evidence was properly admitted, that his Honor could not grant the motion for judgment of nonsuit upon the ground that there was ho evidence that the plaintiff was a corporation.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Otis Elevator Co. v. Cape Fear Hotel Co., 172 N.C. 319 (N.C. 1916).
172 N.C. 319 (Otis Elevator Co. v. Cape Fear Hotel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WICKES CORPORATION v. Hodge
172 S.E.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)