Otis Elevator Co. v. Bruce
251 So. 2d 141
Opinion
Upon examining the record-on-appeal and the arguments presented to us, we hold the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was properly before the jury. Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive System, Inc., Fla.1950, 48 So.2d 82; Holman v. Ford Motor Company, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 40; Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company, 1957, 8 Misc.2d 87, 165 N.Y.S.2d 630 and Domany v. Otis Elevator Company, 6th C.A. 1966, 369 F.2d 604, cert. den. at 387 U.S. 942, 87 S.Ct. 2073, 18 L.Ed.2d 1327.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Otis Elevator Co. v. Bruce, 251 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
251 So. 2d 141 (Otis Elevator Co. v. Bruce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holman v. Ford Motor Company
239 So. 2d 40 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive System
48 So. 2d 82 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
8 Misc. 2d 87 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
United States v. Citizens National Bank
387 U.S. 941 (Supreme Court, 1967)