Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

155 F.2d 522, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2234
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 29, 1946·No. 9059·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action by a shareholder suing the corporate and individual defendants for alleged negligence in failing to take steps which the plaintiff alleges were necessary in the exercise of reasonable care in the course of the refunding of certain corporate indebtedness. There is little, if any, dispute between the parties as to the rules of law applicable. The appellant makes the point that the court’s conclusion did not properly apply the law to the facts before it. This matter was thoroughly considered by Judge Kalodner in the District Court and every important phase of the matter was discussed in his opinion. 1945, 61 F. Supp. 905. We agree with that opinion and affirm his judgment for the reasons stated by him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 155 F.2d 522, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2234 (3d Cir. 1946).

155 F.2d 522 (Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Messing v. FDI, Inc.
439 F. Supp. 776 (D. New Jersey, 1977)
Cannon v. US Acoustics Corporation
398 F. Supp. 209 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)
Nanfito v. TEKSEED HYBRID COMPANY
341 F. Supp. 240 (D. Nebraska, 1972)
Selama-Dindings Plantations, Ltd. v. Durham
216 F. Supp. 104 (S.D. Ohio, 1963)